Skip to content Skip to footer

There was a Time before Mathematica-Stephen Wolfram Writings

In a couple of weeks it’ll be 25 years ago: June 23, 1988-the day Mathematica was launched. Late the night before we have been still duplicating floppy disks and stuffing product boxes. People have been pretty excited to see what Mathematica may do. And there have been fairly good speeches about the promise of Mathematica from a spectrum of laptop industry leaders, together with Steve Jobs (then at Next), who was form sufficient to come back even though he hadn’t appeared in public for some time. So much has happened with Mathematica within the quarter century since then. What began with Mathematica 1.0 has was the huge system that is Mathematica immediately. But to me what’s maybe most satisfying is how the basic principles on which I built Mathematica have stood the take a look at of time. And the way the core concepts and language that were in Mathematica 1.Zero persist at this time (and yes, most Mathematica 1.Zero code will still run unchanged today).

But, Ok, where did Mathematica come from? How did it come to be the best way it’s? It’s an extended story, really. Deeply entwined with my own private story. But particularly as I look to the longer term, I find it interesting to know how issues have evolved from all that history. Perhaps the primary faint glimmering of an orientation toward something like Mathematica got here when I used to be about 6 years outdated-and realized that I might “automate” these tedious addition sums I was being given, by creating an “addition slide rule” out of two rulers. I by no means favored calculational math, and was never good at it. But starting around the age of 10, I became more and more all for physics-and doing physics required doing math. Electronic calculators arrived on the scene when I was 12-and that i immediately turned an enthusiast. And around the same time, I began using my first computer-an object the size of a big desk, with 8 kilowords of 18-bit reminiscence, programmed largely in assembler utilizing paper tape.

I tried doing physics with it, to no great success. But by the point I was 16, I had printed just a few physics papers, left high school, and was working at a British government lab. “Real” theoretical physicists principally didn’t use computers in those days. But I did. Alternating between an HP desk calculator (with a plotter!) and an IBM mainframe programmed in Fortran. I used to be mainly simply doing numerics, though. But in the physics I wanted to do, there was all kinds of algebra. And not just a bit of algebra. Huge quantities. Expressions from Feynman diagrams with a whole lot or thousands of phrases, all of which had to be exactly right if one was going to get the correct answer. I wondered what to do. I imagined spending my life chasing minus indicators and components of 2. But then I started serious about utilizing a computer to assist. And proper then somebody advised me that different folks had had that thought too.

There were three packages that I came upon about-all as it turned out started some 14 years earlier from a single dialog at CERN in 1962: Reduce (written in LISP), Ashmedai (written in Fortran) and Schoonschip (written in CDC 6000 assembler). The packages were specialized, and it wasn’t clear how many people aside from their authors had ever used them severely. They were fairly clunky to use: usually you’d submit a deck of playing cards, and then a while later get back a outcome-or more usually a cryptic error message. But I managed to begin doing physics with them. Then within the summer time of 1977 I discovered the ARPANET, or what’s now the internet. There were only 256 hosts on it back then. And @O 236 went to an open laptop at MIT that ran a program called Macsyma-that did algebra, and could be used interactively. I was amazed so few people used it.

Leave a comment